It is a bold choice and
it changes my perspective on Romney.
Bold in that it increases the likelihood that the election will be seen
as a clear choice. That clarity wins
Romney some points with me.
My main concern is the
money.
It is hard to determine
from both sides massive campaign of pandering to the middle class, what (if
anything) either of them has in mind with regard to this problem.
I, of course, do not
believe in the Republican approach with their tax cuts and fairy dust.
But they do seem to be
saying that we have to cut spending.
The Democrats do not
convince me that they are even serious about the problem.
For example if they use Mediscare
(as they already have, showing a Ryan look alike pushing granny off of a cliff)
it will suggest that they believe that there are no serious problems there and
that no reductions will be needed.
The claim that a $70
billion/yr tax on the rich will solve our financial problems (which include but
are not limited to a $1400 billion/yr deficit) without resorting to taxing the
middle class borders on lunacy.
So if they get elected by
promising folks that we will not have to give up anything, then how will they
solve the problem?
The first job of a leader
is to define reality.
I see more reality from the Rs than the Ds right now.
I see more reality from the Rs than the Ds right now.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment