"There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos"
Jim Hightower-TX writer-politician
I disagree with Hightower.
What you will find here is: a centrist's view of current events;
a collection of thoughts, arguments, and observations
that I have found appealing and/or amusing over the years;
and, if you choose, your civil contributions which will make it into a conversation.
He not busy bein' born, is busy dyin'. - Bob Dylan
Please refer to participants only by their designated identities.
suggestion for US citizens: When a form asks for your race, write in: -- American
I have always heard that the reason was to incentivize an individual to invest as opposed to putting their discretionary income under the mattress. I never really bought that explanation.
If I turned the question around and asked why are tax rates on wage incomes higher than those on cap gains I could easily surmise that the government needed the money from higher rates on one and not necessarily on the other, at the time the rate structure was put in place.
Going back to the original question on this post I could interpret the question as why is the Government missing an opportunity for additional revenue that could be derived from taxing cap gains at the same rates as wage income. A valid question since it appears that many Americans now want a larger Government which will require more revenue.
Cap gains tax rates could easily be a soft target for this Administration since the Rs have a reputation for being rich and most concerned with preserving lower cap gains rates. And the average voter would not notice what higher cap gains taxes would do to the purchasing power of their 401K until they retire and begin getting a distribution.
I have always heard that the reason was to incentivize an individual to invest as opposed to putting their discretionary income under the mattress. I never really bought that explanation.
ReplyDeleteIf I turned the question around and asked why are tax rates on wage incomes higher than those on cap gains I could easily surmise that the government needed the money from higher rates on one and not necessarily on the other, at the time the rate structure was put in place.
Going back to the original question on this post I could interpret the question as why is the Government missing an opportunity for additional revenue that could be derived from taxing cap gains at the same rates as wage income. A valid question since it appears that many Americans now want a larger Government which will require more revenue.
Cap gains tax rates could easily be a soft target for this Administration since the Rs have a reputation for being rich and most concerned with preserving lower cap gains rates. And the average voter would not notice what higher cap gains taxes would do to the purchasing power of their 401K until they retire and begin getting a distribution.