Two weeks ago a close 90 year old
relative had a major stroke. Efforts to
save her were heroic. Still, she will
never be able to take care of herself and her husband of 92 is not able to
perform that task. Hospital bills are in
the 100 thousands and growing (covered by medicare and a supplement). Soon she
will be sent home from rehab in an un-rehabilitated state. It seem that what can be done as far as rehab
is concerned coincides with how much Medicare will pay. Still, the social net is in place and home
care will be provided at taxpayer expense for the rest of her life. This
includes care for the husband with daily chores such as shopping and cooking.
Money is not the issue in this case, quality
of life is! Her husband has perhaps a
few years left to watch his wife mumble (sometimes) incoherently in her wheel
chair. She will endure having some
stranger feed her and change her diaper.
Both the husband and wife have
expressed a wish to be able to simply lay their heads down together and go to
sleep.
What would be so wrong with that?
C&C Rehab does not just treat an addiction. We treat a person - a human being with specific needs, histories and reasons for becoming dependent on a substance or a way of life. C&C looks deep at the problems of each individual and designs a custom addiction treatment program to fit the needs of your addiction and of YOU.
ReplyDelete(www.careandconcerntrust.com)
===========================
Alcohol rehabilitation center in mumbai
This is an exceedingly tough question, and one which saddens me to take either side. I think back to "Brave New World" and I think that perhaps suffering has its merits; even if it is me who is suffering. There is not just the slippery slope of defining just when someone is ill enough or old and decrepit enough to permit an assisted death, or the darker side of when devious relatives might wish to rush things a bit to their benefit (not suggesting that in this case, of course), but there is also the slippery slope of how much suffering society is willing to put up with before they institute a way of dismissing it. I think that one of humankind's greatest assets is also one of its greatest perils: its ability to acclimate to almost anything. What is shocking today will seem quite tame in a generation and then what shocks that generation will not seem as strange to the one after that. It seems like many movies these days are so much in the extreme (violence, dystopia, etc), probably because those of 10 years ago are not boldly shocking enough to bring people to the theaters. I'm starting to ramble now, so I'd better stop while I have a point, which is "I think that we need to feel sadness and pain on occasion (at least when it is there to be felt), or we might turn into something we wouldn't like." That doesn't do that couple any good, but I suppose one day I'll have to 'do my part' as well.
ReplyDeleteI Positing that perhaps their misery has a purpose, even though it is not for them, sounds a bit cold. I apologize. I didn't intend to make light of their misery. I see and feel your point and their misery very acutely.
ReplyDelete...and I would support their choice of action.
Delete