I disagree with Hightower.

What you will find here is: a centrist's view of current events;
a collection of thoughts, arguments, and observations
that I have found appealing and/or amusing over the years;
and, if you choose, your civil contributions which will make it into a conversation.

He not busy bein' born, is busy dyin'. - Bob Dylan

Please refer to participants only by their designated identities.

suggestion for US citizens: When a form asks for your race, write in: -- American

Monday, November 29, 2010

leaks

Why is nothing being done about Wikileaks?
If you make public a country's military secrets
are you not engaging in warfare on the side of their enemies?
What is a CIA for?

2 comments:

  1. I agree, a case can be made that by divulging military (and state?) secrets, Wikileaks and its abettors (not just front man Julian Assange) are engaging in warfare against the U.S. In this sense Wikileaks is a stateless enemy.

    Now, our response to the actions of another stateless enemy -- Islamic terrorists -- was to declare a War on Terror and on those state actors who give harbor to terrorists. And since there is no clear way to tell when a conflict with a stateless enemy has ceased, we have consigned ourselves to indefinite detention of enemy combatants.

    So, do we assassinate Assange? Do we drag him off to Gitmo (which is still open, Wayne's 11/20/2010 post notwithstanding)? Do we declare a War on Leaks? Do we make a concerted effort -- diplomatic, covert, whatever -- to get the guy here and try him? (Apparently the Justice Dept is studying the possibility of bringing criminal charges against Assange.)

    Actually I'm open-minded on all those questions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Assange is in custody - where are the indictments (from the US)?

    ReplyDelete