.
In Obama's speech at the UN the president of the US describes to the rest of the world the reality of tolerance as we see it. An excerpt is below:
....
In Obama's speech at the UN the president of the US describes to the rest of the world the reality of tolerance as we see it. An excerpt is below:
....
Here in the United States, countless publications
provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do
not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. As President of our country
and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call
me awful things every day -- (laughter) -- and I will always defend their right
to do so.
And yet the turmoil of recent weeks reminds us that
the path to democracy does not end with the casting of a ballot. Nelson Mandela
once said: “To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a
way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.”
True democracy demands that citizens cannot be thrown
in jail because of what they believe, and that businesses can be opened without
paying a bribe. It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their minds and
assemble without fear, and on the rule of law and due process that guarantees
the rights of all people.
In other words, true democracy -- real freedom -- is
hard work. Those in power have to resist the temptation to crack down on
dissidents. In hard economic times, countries must be tempted -- may be tempted
to rally the people around perceived enemies, at home and abroad, rather than
focusing on the painstaking work of reform.
Moreover, there will always be those that reject human
progress -- dictators who cling to power, corrupt interests that depend on the
status quo, and extremists who fan the flames of hate and division. From
Northern Ireland to South Asia, from Africa to the Americas, from the Balkans to
the Pacific Rim, we’ve witnessed convulsions that can accompany transitions to a
new political order.
At time, the conflicts arise along the fault lines of
race or tribe. And often they arise from the difficulties of reconciling
tradition and faith with the diversity and interdependence of the modern world.
In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs
threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask
themselves how much they’re willing to tolerate freedom for others.
That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as
a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I
have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this
video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common
humanity.
It is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as
well -- for as the city outside these walls makes clear, we are a country that
has welcomed people of every race and every faith. We are home to Muslims who
worship across our country. We not only respect the freedom of religion, we have
laws that protect individuals from being harmed because of how they look or what
they believe. We understand why people take offense to this video because
millions of our citizens are among them.
I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban
such a video. And the answer is enshrined in our laws: Our Constitution protects
the right to practice free speech.
Americans have fought and died around the globe to
protect the right of all people to express their views, even views that we
profoundly disagree with. We do not do so because we support hateful speech, but
because our founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of
each individual to express their own views and practice their own faith may be
threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech
can quickly become a tool to silence critics and oppress minorities.
We do so because given the power of faith in our
lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest
weapon against hateful speech is not repression; it is more speech -- the voices
of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of
understanding and mutual respect.
Now, I know that not all countries in this body share
this particular understanding of the protection of free speech. We recognize
that. But in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive
views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can
control the flow of information is obsolete. The question, then, is how do we
respond?
And on this we must agree: There is no speech that
justifies mindless violence. There are no words that excuse the killing of
innocents. There’s no video that justifies an attack on an embassy. There’s no
slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or
destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan.
In this modern world with modern technologies, for us
to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who engages in
such speech to create chaos around the world. We empower the worst of us if
that’s how we respond.
More broadly, the events of the last two weeks also
speak to the need for all of us to honestly address the tensions between the
West and the Arab world that is moving towards democracy.
Now, let me be clear: Just as we cannot solve every
problem in the world, the United States has not and will not seek to dictate the
outcome of democratic transitions abroad. We do not expect other nations to
agree with us on every issue, nor do we assume that the violence of the past
weeks or the hateful speech by some individuals represent the views of the
overwhelming majority of Muslims, any more than the views of the people who
produced this video represents those of Americans. However, I do believe that it
is the obligation of all leaders in all countries to speak out forcefully
against violence and extremism.
...
If the situation has been reduced to abridge free speech or accept that the products of free speech will (in the name of religion) be used to justify violence this may, in fact, be a seminal moment.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like you may be quite right Tom. Freedom of speech vs. respect for religious beliefs. This is a huge moral dilemma and one that we tackle here at home on a regular basis, although with much less bloodshed.
DeleteI can't recall where I saw it but it was discussed what Christianity was up to when it was about the age of Islam. Yikes! 1400 years must be the teenage years for a religion.