Romney - foreign
policy
Recall that: What
I hope will be characteristic of our foreign policy goes something like this:
1. Be strong
where US security is involved.
2. Be reluctant
to interfere inside other countries even “for their benefit.” Use all other
available means first.
3. If you must
go into another country, then go in carefully and get a lot of other countries
to go with you so that it is (and appears to be) a world action.
4. Lay the
groundwork for reducing the military budget (I would hope to about 3 % of GDP)
AND reducing the military mission by a concomitant amount.
5. Agree with Walter
Lippman’s belief that: "Foreign Policy is bringing into balance the
nation’s commitments and the nation’s power, with a comfortable margin of power
in reserve."
So what would I
expect Romney to do vis a vis this program?
1. Very good.
2. I think he would be more willing to interfere
than I would like.
3. Probably more unilateral than I would like.
4. It sounds like a no here. Romney does not sound like someone who is
willing to reduce our role in the world, or the role of our military and (concomitantly)
their budget.
5. I do believe that Romney indicates that he is
more alarmed by our fiscal situation than Obama indicates that he is (the
difference of roles – incumbent v challenger – may account for that) and that
is very positive. A strong economy and
rational limitation on what it can provide to support our foreign policy are
essential to meeting Lippman’s description.
The Afghanistan
war is going to be very difficult for any president.
In summary I
expect that Romney would offer a very traditional foreign policy which I would
not like as much as what I think Obama’s policy is.
Probably give
him a C.
No comments:
Post a Comment