I like the DDC = debt-deficit commission and its realistic proposals.
I'll start with defense.
If we are going to move toward taking a realistic view of our role in the world (one based on our 25% of World Production down from the 50% we enjoyed immediately after WWII) then that will involve reducing our military expenditures to considerably less than half of the total world expenditures.
They were right on target on that.
I don't say that lightly as I think many people have in the past.
I don't think we should kid ouselves with talk about fraud and waste ... . It means that we will have to say that some areas of the world are beyond the pale. We will have to withdraw from some areas. Obviously those decisions will have to be mades at the highest level and should require a bipartisan effort. We can't have the areas that we are involved in change with every election.
So if someone is going to support this position then they have to be willing to say yes such and such area is not going to get as much attention from us in the future as it has in the past.
For starters I would suggest the question: "Why should we consider N. Korea to be our problem?"
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Because Lawrence Harvey almost assassinated the future President of the United States?
ReplyDelete