So Paypal and mastercard and others shut off wikileaks (good I think) and now all sorts of folks are attacking their sites because of that.
1. The government leaned on pp and mc to do that, right?
2. A website is something that is owned and is therefore property, right?
Is it not against the law to "attack" someone's website?
3 If not. Shouldn't it be?
1. The government leaned on pp and mc to do that, right?
2. A website is something that is owned and is therefore property, right?
Is it not against the law to "attack" someone's website?
3 If not. Shouldn't it be?
No comments:
Post a Comment