Is good for the gander.
At least according to the list of companies on this web site. http://www.thepoliceloophole.com/
The subject is firearms and here is a policy quote from the
1st manufacturer/supplier on the list.
“If a product that we manufacture is not
legal for a private citizen to own in a jurisdiction, we will not sell that
product to a law-enforcement agency in that jurisdiction”.
At the risk of using up my quota of clichés for the day it strikes me as both “cutting off your nose to spite your face and “sticking to your guns”. While I don’t see Remington or Smith & Wesson on the list, I do see 37 for profit companies that are willing to put principle over profit just as the OWS people advocated.
I don't think that I agree with these companies, however I do like the connection to OWS.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure there's plenty of calculated profit to go with that principle. Rallying your base and serving as warning to other states/municipalities considering similar limits chief among them.
ReplyDeleteShow me a guns/ammo manufacturer who has voluntarily shown even hinted at genuine reflection post Newtown on the value-vs-cost of the assault products they offer and I will show you principle over profit.